Software archaeology
for AI‑native teams.

Understanding why code exists is how you stop breaking it.

AI is rewriting the rules of software.

But the tools devs rely on haven't caught up.

Developers are burning out.

Not from shipping — from reviewing code they don't fully understand.

• Reviewing PRs for code that duplicates something that already exists
• Asking "why does this exist?" with no-one left who knows
• Merging a feature that quietly conflicts with another
• Fixing a bug — then discovering it broke a constraint nobody documented

The gap nobody owns.

Every team has four disconnected layers. None of them talk to each other.

This should not
be this way.

Software teams have more AI horsepower than ever — and less shared understanding of their own systems.

The problem isn't the code. It's that the why is invisible to both engineers and AI agents.

Imagine a different future.

Developers move up one abstraction level — from how to what and why.

Work on what and why.
Let agents handle how.

Business logic constraints that flow into code — not the other way around.

Feature
  └── implements ──→ Implementation
  └── constrains ──→ Constraint ──→ verifies ──→ Implementation

Introducing Promin.

A knowledge graph that both engineers and AI agents can read.